SENFENG Hybrid BDE10032 vs JFY TPM+ 100L-3100
SENFENG Hybrid BDE10032 and JFY TPM+ 100L-3100 are both hybrid press brakes rated at 100 t with Y1/Y2 synchronisation; SENFENG Hybrid BDE10032 has the longer bed by 100 mm.
| Specification | SENFENG Hybrid BDE10032 | JFY TPM+ 100L-3100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drive System | Hybrid | Hybrid | |
| Synchronisation | Y1/Y2 (each side controlled) | Y1/Y2 (each side controlled) | |
| CNC controller | Delem, ESA or Cybelec | TJS-90T | |
| Bending length | 3,200 mm | 3,100 mm | 100 mm |
| Pressing force | 100 t | 100 t | Same |
| Distance between side frames | 2,600 mm | 2,700 mm | 100 mm |
| Maximum opening | 480 mm | Not provided | |
| Maximum stroke | Not provided | 315 mm | |
| Throat depth | 400 mm | 450 mm | 50 mm |
| Closing speed | 180 mm/s | 220 mm/s | 40 mm/s |
| Maximum working speed | 10 mm/s | 10 mm/s | Same |
| Return speed | 160 mm/s | 220 mm/s | 60 mm/s |
| Source | senfenglaser.com, 27 October 2026 | jfy-international.com, 27 October 2026 |
What differs
JFY TPM+ 100L-3100 publishes the faster approach and return speeds (220 and 220 mm/s), while working speed is the same on both at 10 mm/s.
JFY TPM+ 100L-3100 has the deeper throat, by 50 mm. SENFENG publishes the maximum opening (480 mm) and JFY the stroke (315 mm), so the two cannot be compared on either.
Controls differ: SENFENG offers Delem, ESA, Cybelec controls, while JFY fits a TJS control on this model.
How this page was made
- Both columns come from the makers’ own specification tables; nothing is estimated, and a value a maker does not publish is shown as Not provided.
- Sources: JFY (jfy-international.com, read 27 October 2026); SENFENG (senfenglaser.com, read 27 October 2026). Each machine links to its own page with the source row.
- The text was drafted with an AI model (Claude, from Anthropic) from these figures only, checked against the table by Claude (AI) on 28 October 2026. Counts and values in the text are computed from the table.